Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 07:32
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 60.4 1-Core 128 2-Core 226 75% 138 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 750 71% 590 Pts	64-Core 988 61% 988 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Lighting 65.5 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 79.8 53% 70.2 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 62.2 Splatting 54.1 49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 54 40 41 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 444 Write 420 Mixed 360 SusWrite 95.4 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 39 127% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 72.7 DQ Mixed 122 116% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 126%
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$35 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 131GB free Firmware: 1.5.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 178 184 184 204 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 322 Write 144 Mixed 172 SusWrite 190 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 22.1 77% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 124 99% 145 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 1x16GB 821 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 12 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	342x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $88Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	298x

GPU
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	232x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	199x
GTX 1650Nvidia $150Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	175x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	62x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	62x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	58x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350