Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo U9600 323 User benchmarks, average bench 33% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 23 2-Core 50.3 33% 46.9 Pts	4-Core 49.2 8-Core 50.6 7% 49.9 Pts	64-Core 50.3 3% 50.3 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 20E4) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.45 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MMCRE28G8MXP-0VBL1 128GB 556 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: VBM1EL1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 33 63 76 89 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 184 Write 31.7 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 74.3 20% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 8.2 38% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 7.1 DQ Mixed 9.1 7% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM