| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A785TD-M EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100813 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '20 at 18:01 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.7%
Good
|
53% 80.5 Pts
|
30% 237 Pts
|
18% 284 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
|
32%
Below average
|
33% 34.1 fps
|
30% 37.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$40
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 88 101 64 79 86 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
27% 121 MB/s
|
62% 20.9 MB/s
|
22% 30.9 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
216GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
38% 27.8 MB/s
|
105% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.6%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A785TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 62 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 14x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X3 720AMDBench 48%, 2,612 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 4x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $144 |