Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150827
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '16 at 20:30
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 841 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 102 2-Core 199 74% 129 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 745 66% 561 Pts	64-Core 1,670 103% 1,670 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 369.49 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.8% Average	Lighting 53.6 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 68.8 44% 58.9 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 47.7 Splatting 41.4 41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 936GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9382 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1001 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 48 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 103 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2268998340	91% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 499 Mixed 508 113% 507 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 23.2 128% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 20.1 25% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 124%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 1.2TB-$1,000 994 User benchmarks, average bench 202% 346GB free Firmware: 0135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 2,301 Write 1,254 Mixed 1,603 380% 1,720 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 26.6 102% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 151 98% 110 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 250%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290 5,772 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9670 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1109 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 93 93 202 (AE) Unknown 99 99 111 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1702 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 36 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 103816 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23950 (F2) Unknown 99 99 7468	180% Outstanding	Read 1,940 Write 1,090 Mixed 1,259 316% 1,430 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 29.3 108% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 94.1 DQ Mixed 22.2 29% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 241%
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65 502 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 223GB free Firmware: 320ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 5160453 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 14199161919289 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3752 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 707 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 80 64429752346 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5160453 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5160453 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5160453 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18217 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15822 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15822 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23397	74% Very good	Read 497 Write 250 Mixed 312 78% 353 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 13.3 107% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 76.2 DQ Mixed 11.5 54% 127 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 8x8GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 58.4 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 46.3 142% 49.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $184Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	47x
Core i7-5930KIntel $599Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	36x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	17x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $128Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350