Today's hottest deals

Biostar A68N-5200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5200  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150903
Uptime7 Days
Run DateDec 19 '16 at 03:40
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 31
2-Core 61.9
33% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 125
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 200B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 12.6
12% 12.9 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12.4
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 320
Write 168
Mixed 146
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 6.25
49% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 5.89
12% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$27
181GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 147
Mixed 131
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.26
103% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5200 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback