Today's hottest deals

MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7756
MotherboardMSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 08:14
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 287
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1663 MHz, MLim: 1912 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Lighting 74.5
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 69.7
61% 74.2 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 62.8
58% 71.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 34 40 78 77 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 112
Write 70.5
Mixed 59
SusWrite 59.7
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77MA-G43 (MS-7756) Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H77MA-G43 (MS-7756)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback