Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 23471D6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 23471D6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 23471D6
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140819
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 15:12
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 142
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 213
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 998MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.47% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.59 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
2% 2.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.47%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200LPLX-00ZNTT0 320GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 48 40 31 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 41
31% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 3.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback