Today's hottest deals

Viglen DQ77CP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemViglen DQ77CP  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 11:55
Run Duration836 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 75
2-Core 137
56% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 341
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 45.2
Parallax 40
38% 43.8 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.6
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 324 195 76 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 376
Write 347
Mixed 217
SusWrite 110
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 30.7
90% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 47.1
39% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 53%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
270GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 86 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 86.7
Write 95.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 28.3
42% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 84%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
14GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.8 97 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 98.6
Write 98.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 33.1
44% 61 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
535GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 1 120 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 32
SusWrite 41
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CH9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.1% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ77CP Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Viglen DQ77CP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $505
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback