Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 9300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 9300  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Myallm
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 11:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 39.3
28% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 40.4
5% 40.4 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Acer(1025 0112) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 7.15.11.8070
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.12
0% 0.19 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541612J9S 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.2 8.3 8.2 8.3 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 11.8
Mixed 11
SusWrite 8.1
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 9300 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Aspire 9300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback