Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 21:59
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 911
82% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,675
104% 1,675 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6299) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 132
Parallax 110
105% 123 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 122
Splatting 97.4
86% 106 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1671 1675 1645 1592 1594 1600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 1,804
Mixed 1,155
SusWrite 1,630
370% 1,648 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 67.6
252% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,180
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,067
803% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 305%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
236GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 397 402 403 403 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 441
Mixed 379
SusWrite 399
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.3
177% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
223GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 447 437 435 432 381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 437
Mixed 392
SusWrite 429
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55.1
182% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 15.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 10.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback