Today's hottest deals

Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 17:53
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 158
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 373
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 0571) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 1.75
4% 4.39 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 5.67
Splatting 8.26
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,143
Write 4,363
Mixed 4,379
1,031% 4,629 MB/s
4K Read 447
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 237
1,082% 292 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 449
DQ Mixed 574
455% 648 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$52
335GB free
Firmware: 0005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 67.1
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 69.8
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BC1339.M16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback