Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 06:47
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 256
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 827
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 23.4
20% 25.8 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 25
Splatting 32.6
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,005
Write 5,806
Mixed 5,708
1,305% 5,840 MB/s
4K Read 574
4K Write 300
4K Mixed 372
1,504% 415 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 894
685% 934 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
779GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 450 451 451 451 449 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 356
Mixed 368
SusWrite 449
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 36.7
141% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 206
180% 264 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
79GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 108 108 120 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 94
Write 95.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 110
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 75%
ST310003 40AS 1TB
263GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 111
Write 51
Mixed 71
SusWrite 77.8
99% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
101GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 78 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 112
Write 89
Mixed 76
SusWrite 77.8
116% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3264 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 23.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback