Today's hottest deals

VIT M2420

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemVIT M2420  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON A24
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 00:59
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 92.8
50% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 148
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 785MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4101
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.34
2% 1.79 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 44 63 60 55 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 63.2
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 56.9
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3XSDS2G1333 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2420 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: VIT M2420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback