Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 220GE-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 290
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7A39) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 7.25
5% 8.21 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 12.8
8% 9.64 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 519 255 254 257 257 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 805
Write 828
Mixed 759
SusWrite 300
151% 673 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 586
464% 644 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 130%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 30.6
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 24.5
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GRENADE (MS-7A39)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback