Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2PV
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 04:24
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 93.1
1-Core 98
2-Core 115
66% 102 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 131
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 3.47
2% 3.73 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 2.73
Splatting 8.7
5% 5.24 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
677GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 52 63 101 101 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 145
Write 132
Mixed 80
SusWrite 88.7
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2PV-CF Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback