Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 01:00
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$380
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,132
103% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,650
102% 1,650 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 60.7
57% 67 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 63.8
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 832 832 841 839 834 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2613
Write 1,956
Mixed 1,461
SusWrite 900
386% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 89
307% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 511
540% 896 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 303%
Great: 372%
Apacer AS2280P2 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: AP120PG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 929 793 516 517 519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 875
Mixed 781
SusWrite 699
175% 776 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 53.7
202% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 836
628% 841 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 172%
Great: 192%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 145 147 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 75
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 104%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 180 178 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 178
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 178
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94%
Great: 113%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
272GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 102 101 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 87
Write 93.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 102
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
468GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 80 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42% Average
Read 64.5
Write 70.7
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 81.6
42% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLB-16G JM2666HLB-16G TS2GLH64V6B Adata 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27.2
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $622
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback