Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V7.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V7.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V7.2
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 11:32
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 102
48% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 269
28% 226 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Clevo(1558 1501) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4120
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 19.3
18% 19.4 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16.6
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP550NS38 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0414B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 79 76 91 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 429
Write 372
Mixed 317
SusWrite 108
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 13
42% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 30.3
102% 223 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.2
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V7.2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V7.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback