Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 218
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 625
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 757
47% 757 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 75.9
41% 62.8 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 51.5
45% 55.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 250GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 210 196 182 178 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 406
Write 284
Mixed 232
SusWrite 198
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 3.9
51% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 43.3
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 82.9
82% 125 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 27.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback