PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock B85 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130704 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 09 '19 at 07:59 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.1%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 35 35 38 37 37 MB/s
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Ct500mx5 CT500MX50 500GB
137GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 411 411 409 376 333 MB/s
|
99.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
861GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 208 209 206 207 205 MB/s
|
119%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F6451U67F1600G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 126x |
Core i5-4570Intel $65Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 65x |
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 51x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 68x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 56x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 48x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $509 |