Today's hottest deals

Novatech MBB-96004D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNovatech MBB-96004D  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte A320M-H-CF
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 23:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 70
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 643
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.6% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 59.1
52% 62.8 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 65
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 62 67 49 73 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 412
Write 361
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 104
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
122GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 116 105 117 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 123
Mixed 29
SusWrite 120
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
204GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 26 56 44 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 14.2
Write 46.8
Mixed 32
SusWrite 35.7
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-55JJ5T0 320GB
188GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 34 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 28.7
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 33.6
38% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-008.A00G Adata 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback