Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 00:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 183
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 582
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 679
42% 679 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 043B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17
Parallax 22.7
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 19
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 134 138 103 139 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 225
Write 241
Mixed 238
SusWrite 135
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 20.1
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 47.8
74% 141 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 250GB
209GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 16 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 16.5
18% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/2G Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback