Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170M Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 04:36
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 256
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 473
63% 472 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
PNY(196E 1215) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 139
Parallax 117
104% 128 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 125
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 491 45 27 21 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,512
Write 1,643
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 331
257% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 85.7
302% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 907
DQ Mixed 319
407% 725 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 215%
Great: 282%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
84GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 366 413 413 422 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 463
Mixed 330
SusWrite 392
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48.6
178% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 171
176% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
Mushkin Reactor 256GB-$114
19GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 187 77 52 51 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 514
Write 302
Mixed 286
SusWrite 90.8
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 41.8
157% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 144
146% 236 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
315GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 70.5
Write 69
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 108
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $547
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback