Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q TURBO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q TURBO  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090804
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 08:20
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$192
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 57
34% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 91.3
13% 94.9 Pts
64-Core 97.9
6% 97.9 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 62.8
40% 48.2 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 41.3
34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 82 81 90 96 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 97.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 82.6
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.8
347% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
26GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 56 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 55.7
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 59%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 4TB
172GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 5.8
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.3
280% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 27.7
Write 14.8
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 5.8
13% 17 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
73GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 69 70 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 68.5
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52%
Great: 82%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 2TB
200GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 30
Mixed 15
SusWrite 5.8
15% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 76%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 33
Write 20
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 5.9
16% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q TURBO Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q TURBO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback