PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q TURBO (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090804 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '19 at 08:20 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 73% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$192
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.8%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 82 81 90 96 91 MB/s
|
51%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
26GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 56 58 57 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic DISK02 4TB
172GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Jmicron Generic DISK01 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
|
9.88%
Terrible
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
73GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 69 70 68 70 MB/s
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic DISK03 2TB
200GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.6 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Jmicron Generic DISK00 2TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.3 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 6x |
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $54Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $91Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 3x |
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 3x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $304 |