Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 08:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 435
58% 434 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 82.9
0% 50.6 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 56.5
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 73 39 121 33 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 201
Write 96.9
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 96.6
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 10.5
45% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 15
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
685GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 172 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 165
Mixed 109
SusWrite 174
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 34.8
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.1
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback