Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 255 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8137
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160126
Uptime137.8 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 08:18
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6015 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Memory 11
1-Core 6.1
2-Core 15.5
7% 10.9 Pts
4-Core 22.6
8-Core 27.9
3% 25.2 Pts
64-Core 26.2
2% 26.2 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8137) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 1.91
1% 2.16 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.61
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
810GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA7G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 66 47 38 32 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 42.7
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
5.38% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.6
MC Mixed 2.5
6% 1.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 395
10% 395 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 5.38%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback