Today's hottest deals

Intel S5000XVN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardIntel S5000XVN  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090623
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 21:22
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 38
2-Core 76.6
39% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 267
25% 210 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4144
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 1.97
4% 4.82 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.26
4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240GD2DH16 240GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.6% Below average
Read 132
Write 125
Mixed 130
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 14.2
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 13.9
21% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3146855SS 147GB
137GB free
Firmware: 0002
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 122
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.36
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.01
226% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S5000XVN Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S5000XVN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback