Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 11:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 232
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 441
59% 441 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 112
Parallax 106
90% 110 fps
MRender 92.3
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 93
77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 445
Mixed 425
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 41.1
155% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 204
190% 295 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
29GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 132
Mixed 127
50% 234 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 18.8
104% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 48.9
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
927GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 161
Write 129
Mixed 71.5
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-558.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback