Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '19 at 01:40
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 184
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 351
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3552) 2GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 43.4
28% 37.3 fps
MRender 40.9
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 29.4
29% 36.9 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 235 241 242 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.2% Very good
Read 252
Write 243
Mixed 225
SusWrite 238
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 35.6
118% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
149GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.1
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 101
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 0221
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 4.8 2.8 3.9 4.7 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Read 13
Write 1.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.5
8% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C7 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback