Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X510QA
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 01:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 90.2
43% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 1931) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 11.3
6% 9.61 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 8.87
7% 8.19 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 335 347 362 343 356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 450
Write 344
Mixed 366
SusWrite 343
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 26.1
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 48.5
82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X510QA_F510QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback