Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6410  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0YH39C
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateNov 07 '16 at 09:51
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 134
53% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 169
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Dell(1028 040A) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3325
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.58 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
200GB free
Firmware: JA0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 67.5
Mixed 11.7
35% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 57%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF4Z Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 89.8
Write 79.4
Mixed 48.9
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.22
67% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
Read 113
Write 100
Mixed 14.3
86% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.41
64% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 46.4
103% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.42
62% 0.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6410 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback