PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1497 |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '19 at 17:49 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 410
Nvidia(10DE 094A) 512MB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 347.88
|
2.89%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 41 44 57 46 42 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $79Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 625x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 256x |
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 203x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 988x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 112x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $104 |