Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 4752

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4752  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4752
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B950
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 37.1
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 99
33% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 100
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0507) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5059GSXP 500GB-$50
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 49 47 57 61 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 54
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 52.6
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 44%
USB FLASH DRIVE 64GB
59GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 7.3 7.2 8.8 9.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 15.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 9.7
18% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
28% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4752 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback