Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 710
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 38
2-Core 77.1
43% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 114
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 13
Parallax 14.4
10% 13.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 14.5
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 69 76 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 80.4
Write 64
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 64.1
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 50%
WD WD2000BB-22GUC0 200GB
186GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 55.9
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 56
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M61PME-S2P Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback