Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL62VR 7RFX
MotherboardMSI MS-16JB  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 21:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 205
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 361
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11D5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 6.44
5% 28.3 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 546 322 320 322 322 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1545
Write 1,213
Mixed 591
SusWrite 359
205% 927 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 43.3
166% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 643
565% 850 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
874GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 416 434 417 417 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 395
Mixed 359
SusWrite 412
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 37.2
130% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 347
256% 335 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 9905700-011.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JB Builds (Compare 1,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback