Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 10:00
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 142
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 437
43% 352 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 62.7
59% 68.8 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 72.1
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 412
Mixed 412
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 37.9
126% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 188
142% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$69
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,304
Write 42.8
Mixed 59.7
575% 802 MB/s
4K Read 375
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
15,729% 126 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
650GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 200
Mixed 89.5
119% 161 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.2
838% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
628GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 101
Mixed 24.8
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
680GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 27.5
35% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1866C10-8GSR BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. F3-1866C10-8GSR BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 18.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback