Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 07:24
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7550 Dual-Core
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 37
2-Core 74
42% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 74
8-Core 73.9
10% 73.9 Pts
64-Core 73.9
5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Gainward(10B0 1401) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 144 148 150 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 231
Write 207
Mixed 212
SusWrite 146
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 11.7
39% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 14.2
40% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 119%
WD WD30EZRZ-00WN9B0 802GB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 144 148 150 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 9.5
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA78G-DS3H Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback