Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook 2560p

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook 2560p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 162B
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '16 at 15:39
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 124 56% 90.3 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 148 24% 169 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 162B) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2963 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.81 1% 1.29 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.26 1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB 1,828 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM07.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2956 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1749 (A8) Unknown 100 100 5 (AA) Unknown 100 100 372 (AD) Unknown 100 100 6488210 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 120 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 96 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2299	45.1% Average	Read 486 Write 159 Mixed 138 57% 261 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 7.01 43% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84.8 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 20.5 31% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 91%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB 659 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 54GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 22.1 Mixed 25.9 32% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.14 23% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 2560p Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2560p

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	118x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	97x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	92x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	340x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 106 samples	3x

SSD
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	125x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	72x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350