Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 19:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 75.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 817
82% 667 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 93.8
Parallax 85.8
83% 93.8 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 79.3
73% 90.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 144 152 154 149 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 450
Mixed 406
SusWrite 186
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 363
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
PNY XLR8 240GB-$212
62GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 208 205 199 208 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 381
Write 281
Mixed 288
SusWrite 207
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 39.5
150% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 148
144% 229 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
70GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 134
Write 136
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 106
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.8% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 28.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback