Today's hottest deals

Medion P6677 MD60979

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMedion P6677 MD60979  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KGN
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 08:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 272
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Device(1B0A 230B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.8
11% 11.6 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9
8% 9.54 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 198 196 84 74 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 442
Write 247
Mixed 212
SusWrite 132
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 26.9
131% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 185
170% 265 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6677 MD60979 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6677 MD60979

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback