Today's hottest deals

Asus K52F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus K52F  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52F
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '16 at 18:32
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6200
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 90
42% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 91.4
8-Core 89.8
12% 90.6 Pts
64-Core 97.4
6% 97.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1BE2) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2125
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.81
1% 0.91 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 0.96 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 39.9
Write 43.7
Mixed 42.6
32% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.35
73% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24%
Great: 39%
USB DISK 3.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 5500, Kodak
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 22
Mixed 21.1
30% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.38
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.01
25% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 06C1 SSY3128M8-EDJEF 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52F Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback