Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2430 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 142
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 479
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 116
Parallax 114
90% 113 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 91.4
79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 223 218 222 223 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 237
Write 221
Mixed 220
SusWrite 222
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 24.3
112% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 52.9
80% 150 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback