Today's hottest deals

Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H87 Performance  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131121
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 470
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 4.16
3% 4.09 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 3.77
Splatting 6.74
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 338
Write 210
Mixed 219
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 32.6
122% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 173
150% 225 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 84%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
58GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 84.2
Write 78.7
Mixed 42
SusWrite 85.9
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
General UDisk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 6
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5
7% 5.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-560.A00LF 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 9905403-560.A00LF 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback