Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 17:38
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 161
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 364
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 86 88 89 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 87.2
Write 89.8
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 86
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
110GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 97.8
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 62%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion VN337AA-ABE HPE-002es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback