Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '19 at 16:11
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 174
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 620
55% 467 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 27.7
17% 21.9 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 21.2
16% 19 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G32MNB-2202A 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10103L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 152 132 152 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 451
Write 148
Mixed 170
SusWrite 148
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 19.2
68% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 11.8
35% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 87%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$92
179GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 357 356 360 360 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 468
Write 360
Mixed 314
SusWrite 356
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 26
96% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 93.8
79% 118 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 28.6
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback