Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 16:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 933
83% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,275
79% 1,275 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.97
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 161
Parallax 170
140% 168 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 148
Splatting 111
116% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$65
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 648 647 620 616 614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 1,672
Mixed 768
SusWrite 672
288% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 60.1
224% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 752
598% 834 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 231%
Great: 254%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00000 256GB
219GB free
Firmware: EXT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 254 254 255 255 254 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 258
Mixed 223
SusWrite 255
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 32.3
147% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 80.5
121% 231 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 93%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$123
3TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 156 155 158 159 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 154
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 157
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 39.6
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 36.9
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 116%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback