Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 0585D49

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 0585D49 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 0585D49
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '19 at 14:00
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 86.7 34% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 160 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 730MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541080G9SA00 80GB 420 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: MB4IC65R SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 19 12 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 22.4 Write 21.7 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 17.3 14% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 18%
Generic SD01G SD Card 1GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free Firmware: 8.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.3 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.77% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.4 5% 6.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 236% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.77% Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 3.5 4.4 4.4 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	8.82% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 8.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4 10% 8.93 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.2 102% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1066KSN-2G 1x2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback