Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL/EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '15 at 11:15
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 95.6
32% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 37% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Asus(1043 01E2) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 0.47
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 154
Write 63.1
Mixed 91.9
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 10.7
66% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 9.51
16% 29.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 51%
OCZ CORE 60GB
17GB free
Firmware: 02.10103 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 116
Write 75
Mixed 80.2
20% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.27
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 1.35
17% 4.15 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
801GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 89.4
Write 87.8
Mixed 70.1
62% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.36
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
175GB free
Firmware: 1AA01107 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 70.5
Mixed 52.9
46% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.24
54% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 60%
WD 15EARS External 1.5TB
720GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 26
Mixed 26.6
34% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 21%
Typical P5KPL/EPU Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback