Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 056959U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 056959U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120703
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 18:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 185
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 560
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D
Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 276.42
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 6.19
6% 7.64 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 8.39
7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 252
Write 230
Mixed 213
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 40.3
126% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 162
115% 148 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
40GB free
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 77 102 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 105
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 81.9
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- Micron 18KSF51272AZ- Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 056959U Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 056959U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $665
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback