| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Quanta TW9/SW9 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel Base Board Product Name |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100819 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 13:10 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
56% 87.5 Pts
|
26% 202 Pts
|
14% 224 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 335M
Quanta(152D 0831) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
3.25%
Terrible
|
3% 3.77 fps
|
3% 3.83 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 61 61 53 60 54 MB/s
|
26.9%
Poor
|
26% 114 MB/s
|
39% 12.9 MB/s
|
74% 104 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
38.2%
Below average
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
57% 70.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TW9/SW9 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Quanta TW9/SW9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples | 39x |
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 28x |
| Core i5 M 450IntelBench 40%, 8,084 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 335MNvidiaBench 3%, 977 samples | 63x |
| GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples | 23x |
| GeForce GT 240MNvidiaBench 2%, 2,359 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $215 |