Today's hottest deals

Pcchips A15G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcchips A15G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCCHIPS A15G
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 22:26
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 140-$9
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 35.7
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 17.9
18% 24 Pts
4-Core 22.5
8-Core 19.4
3% 21 Pts
64-Core 34.7
2% 34.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 36
24% 34.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 35.2
30% 37 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA 165GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.7 24 17 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 20.8
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 17.7
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5429-003.A00LF0 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Pcchips A15G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback